Quotes in minutes
Applications captured once, validated, and sent to rating engines and carrier APIs in parallel. Producers compare coverage and premium on one screen instead of on five carrier portals.
S006 / Industries/ 006 Insurance
006 / 011
Insurance
Webisoft helps brokers, MGAs, and insurers modernize quoting, policy service, and claims: faster rating across carriers, self-service portals for brokers and policyholders, claims that move from intake to close, and the carrier connections that tie it together.
A senior, in-house team since 2016. SOC 2 Type II, AWS Partner.
AICPA SOC 2 Type II
HIPAA compliant
AWS PartnerInsurance
Quoting and claims run on legacy software that slows every interaction and frustrates the people you want to keep. Producers re-key applications into carrier portals, policyholders phone in for documents the system already has, and a claim takes days to reach the adjuster. The broker management system holds the data and refuses to share it.
Our work in this sector includes production systems for a Canadian insurance brokerage.

How
Applications captured once, validated, and sent to rating engines and carrier APIs in parallel. Producers compare coverage and premium on one screen instead of on five carrier portals.
Policy data synchronized between your management system, carrier downloads, and the portal, with every endorsement and renewal tracked. Declarations and certificates are generated from the record, not re-typed.
First notice of loss captured online with photos and documents, checked against coverage in force, routed to the right adjuster, and tracked to close, with the policyholder watching progress instead of calling.
We help brokers, MGAs, and insurers modernize how they quote, bind, service, and settle, and we connect those workflows to the broker management systems, rating engines, and carrier interfaces already in place.
Designed for the data standards and regulatory obligations of the lines you write.
Digital applications, multi-carrier quote comparison, rating-engine integration, underwriting rules, and e-signature binding.
Endorsements, renewals, billing, document generation, and synchronization with your broker management system.
First notice of loss, document and photo capture, adjuster assignment, reserves, payments, and status tracking to close.
Broker, policyholder, and partner portals with self-service certificates, documents, payments, and claims.
Broker management systems, rating engines and comparative raters, carrier APIs and ACORD data exchange, payments, and e-signature.
Services
/001
A fractional CTO or technical review for brokerages and MGAs whose growth is blocked by their management system. We audit the stack, the carrier connections, and the manual work in service and claims, then leave your principals with a roadmap they own.
/002
Quoting, portal, and claims products from MVP to scale: web, mobile, and the internal tools producers, service staff, and adjusters use every day.
/003
Management system, rating engine, carrier, payment, and e-signature integrations with monitoring and reconciliation, so a policy never drifts between systems.
/004
OCR on applications, declarations pages, loss runs, and claim documents, submission triage, and decision support for underwriting and claims, with a licensed person on every decision that matters.
Methodology
We run insurance projects on short cycles and prove each release with one line of business or one team before it goes company-wide. You see it working on your own policies before you commit the brokerage to it. Here is how a typical project runs.
Talk, under NDA, with a team that has already modernized insurance operations.
We map your lines, carriers, systems, and regulatory obligations, then give you a scoped estimate of timeline and cost.
Once you approve the scope, we deliver in short iterations and demo each one against real policy and claim scenarios.
We pilot with one line or one team, fix what producers and adjusters find, then roll out with training and a support channel.
We monitor integrations, handle carrier and rating changes, and keep the platform current with regulatory updates.
Hiring models
H/001
A dedicated team assigned to your insurance platform, coordinated by a consultant who keeps delivery aligned with your growth and service goals.
H/002
Add senior specialists who already know management systems, rating engines, and carrier integration into your existing IT team, working on your process and tools.
H/003
We take the project end to end: discovery, delivery, integration, rollout, and support, with one project manager as your point of contact.
Insurance capabilities
How we work
Proof
We have delivered production systems for a Canadian insurance brokerage.
FAQ (012)
ACORD is the standards body for the insurance industry, and its work appears in two places: standard forms such as applications and the certificate of liability insurance that brokers produce every day, and data standards such as the AL3 format carriers use to download policy data into agency management systems and the XML standards used for property, casualty, and life data exchange. Using the standard still leaves field mapping and carrier-specific extensions to deal with. A well-built platform generates ACORD forms from the policy record and treats each carrier download as a feed to validate and reconcile rather than trust blindly.
A rating engine takes the risk attributes from an application, applies the base rates, factors, discounts, and rules of a rating plan, and returns a premium, and in many lines and jurisdictions that plan must be filed with or approved by the regulator, such as auto rates in several Canadian provinces and many lines in US states. Plans are versioned by effective date, so a quote must be reproducible months later with the plan in force on that day. Carriers expose rating through their own APIs or through comparative raters that aggregate several carriers; a well-built platform records the inputs, the plan version, and the result for every quote.
A policy administration system handles the life of the contract: quote, bind, issue, endorse, renew, cancel, bill, and generate documents. A claims system handles what happens after a loss: first notice, coverage verification, adjuster assignment, reserves, payments, subrogation, and litigation. The two meet at coverage verification and at the policy record, and vendors sell them bundled as core suites or separately as best-of-breed; a well-built architecture keeps a clean interface between them so either can be replaced on its own.
Every carrier is different: some offer quote and bind APIs, some offer only a portal, most provide policy downloads in AL3 or XML into the management system, and commission statements and documents arrive in whatever format the carrier uses. Each connection needs appointments, credentials, and a testing cycle, and an MGA also owes the carrier periodic bordereaux of premiums and claims. A well-built platform contains each carrier behind its own adapter, so a carrier that changes its portal or format is a contained change rather than a platform problem.
The broker management system, also called an agency management system, is the system of record for clients, policies, commissions, trust accounting, and carrier downloads, and it is usually the one system every producer and service person works in. Vendor APIs vary from full access to scheduled exports, and replacing the system is a major project because of the accounting and the carrier connections tied to it. A well-built quoting, portal, or claims platform synchronizes clients, policies, and documents with the management system and runs reconciliation so the system of record stays correct.
Licensing, market conduct, and fair treatment of customers are set by provincial regulators in Canada, such as the AMF in Quebec and FSRA in Ontario, and by state insurance departments in the United States, with privacy law such as PIPEDA, Quebec Law 25, and state privacy acts applying to every applicant and policyholder record. Cybersecurity rules now apply directly to many licensees, such as the New York Department of Financial Services cybersecurity regulation and state adoptions of the NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law, and e-signature and record-retention rules govern how policies are bound and kept. Confirm your obligations with your compliance lead; a well-built system makes disclosures, retention periods, and consent configurable per jurisdiction and logs every change to a record.
First notice of loss is the moment a claim enters the system: the policy, the date and location of the loss, a description, photos, the parties and witnesses involved, and any police or incident report. Good intake verifies that coverage was in force on the loss date, assigns the adjuster by rules, sets an initial reserve, and flags indicators that deserve a closer look. A well-built intake flow works from a phone at the scene, hands the adjuster a complete file, and shows the policyholder status without a call.
A reserve is the estimated amount still to be paid on a claim, adjusted as facts emerge, with payments recorded against it and split between indemnity and expense. An MGA that handles claims under delegated authority reports premiums and claims to each carrier in periodic bordereaux, in whatever layout the carrier prescribes. A well-built system keeps a full history of every reserve change and payment and produces bordereaux from that history rather than from a spreadsheet assembled at month-end.
Many carriers and larger brokerages still run policy and billing on decades-old systems that hold the in-force book, so a big-bang replacement risks every renewal. The common approaches are an API layer over the legacy system so new products can be built around it, and a strangler pattern that moves one line of business at a time, often migrating policies at renewal rather than mid-term. A well-run modernization tests rating parity between old and new before any policy moves and keeps the old system readable for historical claims.
Policy documents are assembled from filed forms, endorsements, and jurisdiction-specific disclosures, and in Quebec contracts of adhesion generally must be available in French. E-signature is recognized under federal and provincial electronic commerce laws in Canada and under ESIGN and UETA in the United States, provided the process captures consent, identity, and an evidence record. A well-built platform versions every template, stores the signed document with its audit trail, and regenerates nothing by hand.
Embedded insurance is coverage offered inside another purchase, such as protection at an auto dealer, a travel booking, or an online checkout, with quote and bind delivered through an API in the partner's flow. The distribution partner needs the right licensing, the disclosures still have to be shown, and an MGA or carrier sits behind the API with its own underwriting rules. A well-built program exposes a quote and bind API with rate limits and logging, and feeds every policy into the same administration system as the rest of the book.
The reliable uses are extraction and triage: reading applications, declarations pages, loss runs, and claim documents into structured fields, routing submissions by appetite, and flagging claims for review. Regulators are paying attention to algorithmic decisions, with some US states issuing rules on insurers' use of consumer data and models, the NAIC publishing a model bulletin on AI use, and federally regulated insurers in Canada subject to model risk guidance from OSFI. A well-built system keeps a licensed person on every binding or claims decision and records the inputs behind each recommendation so it can be explained.
Insurance
Costs, speed, revenue or hours of manual work. Tell us what matters most and we will show you how we would approach it.
We read every request
Someone who has worked in your sector, not a sales queue.
We reply with a first view
How we would approach it, and a time to talk.
Scope under NDA
We review what you run today and come back with scope, timeline and cost.