S006 / Industries/ 011 Crypto & Web3

011 / 011

Crypto & Web3

Launch on-chain with a team that has done it before.

Webisoft helps crypto teams take protocols to market safely: layer-1 and layer-2 systems, DeFi protocols, token and NFT contracts, wallets and dApps, and audits that find the problems before users do.

A senior, in-house team since 2016. SOC 2 Type II, AWS Partner.

In business since 2016AICPA SOC 2 Type II HIPAA compliantAWS PartnerGreat Place To Work Certified, Sep 2026 to Sep 2027, Canada
001/

Web3

Crypto and Web3

Web3 moves fast, and one unaudited contract or weak architecture can undo the whole project. Code that holds funds has no undo button, the indexer that feeds the app falls behind, the bridge or oracle you trusted gets exploited, and the roadmap stalls while the team patches. Speed is only an advantage if the foundation holds.

Our work in this sector includes production systems for layer-1 and layer-2 protocols and DeFi teams.

Data center server corridor
002/

How

On-chain systems that hold up under real value

  1. Contracts ready for audit

    Security practices applied during development, not at audit time: unit and fork tests, fuzzing, invariants, and minimal privileged roles. External auditors find fewer issues and the findings are about design, not known bug classes.

  2. Infrastructure that keeps up

    RPC nodes, indexers, relayers, and APIs run and monitored so the application layer reflects the chain in real time and stays up through a launch or a market event.

  3. A launch you can rehearse

    Scripted deployments, verified contracts, ownership on a multisig behind a timelock, and an incident runbook. Mainnet day is a checklist, not an improvisation.

003/

How we take protocols to mainnet

We help layer-1 and layer-2 teams, DeFi protocols, and Web3 products design, deliver, and audit protocols, smart contracts, and the off-chain systems around them.

We work in Solidity, Rust, and CosmWasm across EVM chains, Solana, and Cosmos, and we deliver the indexers, wallets, and front ends that make a protocol usable.

  1. 01

    Protocols and smart contracts

    DeFi protocols, token and NFT contracts, staking, vaults, governance, and custom layer-1 and layer-2 components.

  2. 02

    Problems found before launch

    Manual review backed by static analysis, fuzzing, and invariant testing, with a written report, severity ratings, and remediation support.

  3. 03

    Products people can use

    Web and mobile front ends, wallet connection, account abstraction, transaction simulation, and signing UX.

  4. 04

    Infrastructure that stays up

    Node operations, indexers and subgraphs, relayers, oracle integration, and monitoring on critical contract events.

  5. 05

    Connected systems

    Custody and exchange APIs, fiat on-ramps, KYC providers, bridges, and chain analytics.

004/

Services

Our services for crypto teams

  1. /001

    Advisory

    A fractional CTO or architecture and security review for protocols and Web3 products before a launch, a raise, or a major upgrade. We review the design and the code, then leave your founders with a roadmap they own.

  2. /002

    Protocols and contracts

    Smart contracts, protocol components, and layer-1 and layer-2 systems in Solidity, Rust, and CosmWasm, with tests and documentation delivered alongside the code.

  3. /003

    Product and infrastructure

    dApps, wallets, indexers, and APIs delivered and operated so the protocol has a product people can use and an infrastructure layer that stays up.

  4. /004

    Audits and AI tooling

    Security audits of contracts and systems, plus AI-assisted monitoring and analysis on your own on-chain data, with every finding reviewed by a senior specialist.

Methodology

Our transformation methodology

We run Web3 projects on short cycles: a working contract on testnet early, tested against real scenarios, then steady progress toward audit and mainnet. You see progress on testnet, not in a slide deck. Here is how a typical project runs.

  1. 1

    Connect

    Talk, under NDA, with a team that has already taken protocols to mainnet.

  2. 2

    Estimate

    We write a specification with invariants, chain recommendation, and audit plan, then give you a scoped estimate of timeline and cost.

  3. 3

    Deliver

    Once you approve the scope, we deliver in short iterations with tests growing alongside the code and each milestone deployed to testnet.

  4. 4

    Launch

    After internal review, external audit, and fixes with regression tests, we run the rehearsed deployment and verify contracts on mainnet.

  5. 5

    Support

    We monitor contracts and infrastructure, respond to incidents under the runbook, and support upgrades as standards evolve.

Hiring models

Ways to engage our Web3 team

(3)
  1. H/001

    Dedicated team

    A dedicated blockchain team assigned to your protocol or product, coordinated by a consultant who keeps delivery aligned with your launch and tokenomics goals.

  2. H/002

    Team extension

    Add senior Solidity, Rust, or infrastructure specialists directly to your existing team, working on your process and tools.

  3. H/003

    Project-based

    We take the project end to end: specification, delivery, audit coordination, launch, and support, with one project manager as your point of contact.

007/

Web3 capabilities

Where we add value on Web3 work

Contracts that hold money with no undo button need a standard closer to avionics than to a typical web product. These are the areas where our Web3 work goes deeper than a demo that works on the happy path.
  1. Protocol and mechanism design

    We turn a whitepaper or a spreadsheet into a specification with state, actors, privileged functions, invariants, and the economic assumptions attackers will test. Design decisions on chain, standards, and upgradeability are made explicitly and documented before code is written.
  2. Contracts on the right chain

    Solidity and Vyper on the EVM and its layer-2s, Rust on Solana and CosmWasm, and Move where it fits, with each VM's failure modes understood: reentrancy and delegatecall on the EVM, account and CPI constraints on Solana, resource semantics on Move chains.
  3. Security audits

    Line-by-line manual review backed by static analysis, fuzzing, and invariant testing, for your own code or a protocol you plan to integrate. You get a written report with severity, proof-of-concept where applicable, and remediation guidance, plus a re-review of fixes.
  4. Indexing and infrastructure

    Node operations, subgraphs and custom indexers, relayers, and APIs that keep the application layer in sync with the chain, with reorg handling, monitoring, and capacity for traffic spikes around launches and market events.
  5. Wallets and transaction UX

    dApp front ends with wallet connection, account abstraction and smart accounts, gas sponsorship, transaction simulation, and clear error handling, so users understand what they are signing and why a transaction failed.
  6. Launch and incident operations

    Deterministic deploy scripts, contract verification, ownership transfer to multisig, timelocks, parameter checklists, monitoring on critical events, and an incident runbook with pause procedures and named roles rehearsed before mainnet.

How we work

How a Web3 engagement runs

(4)
  1. 1

    Specification and threat modeling

    We turn your intent into a written specification: contract architecture, invariants, trust assumptions on every external dependency, chain and standards recommendations, and an audit plan with firms booked early. The output is a standalone document and a milestone-priced delivery plan that belongs to your team.
  2. 2

    Delivery with tests as proof

    Contracts are built with unit, fuzz, and invariant tests growing alongside them and fork tests against mainnet state for anything touching live protocols. Off-chain components progress in parallel. You review progress at each milestone, deployed to a testnet you can use.
  3. 3

    Audit, hardening, and rehearsal

    We freeze the code, run internal review and the static-analysis battery, support the external audit daily, implement fixes with regression tests, and rehearse the deployment on a fork until the checklist is clean.
  4. 4

    Launch and operate

    Mainnet deployment runs from the rehearsed script with contracts verified, ownership transferred to your multisig, and timelocks active. Post-launch we monitor critical events and infrastructure, respond under the runbook, and support upgrades. Your team holds the contract repositories, the deployment tooling, and the signing keys.

Proof

We have delivered production systems for layer-1 and layer-2 protocols and DeFi teams.

SOC 2 Type II / HIPAA / AWS Partner / Clutch 4.9/5

FAQ (012)

Crypto & Web3 questions buyers ask us

001What does a smart contract audit cover, and what does it not?

An audit is a time-boxed review of a specific commit by people who combine manual reading with static analysis, fuzzing, and invariant testing, producing findings ranked by severity with remediation advice and usually a re-review of fixes. It does not prove the absence of bugs, it rarely covers economic design in depth, and it says nothing about the deployment configuration, the admin keys, or the off-chain systems unless those are in scope. A well-run project books the audit early, freezes the code before it starts, and treats the audit as one layer alongside internal review, a bug bounty, and monitoring.

002Should contracts be upgradeable, and how do proxy patterns work?

Upgradeable contracts route calls through a proxy that delegates to an implementation contract that can be swapped, with the storage living in the proxy, which is why storage layout mistakes and uninitialized implementations are a recurring source of exploits. Upgradeability lets a team fix bugs and evolve the protocol, but it asks users to trust whoever holds the upgrade key, so immutable contracts with tunable parameters often earn more trust. When it is justified, a well-built system puts the upgrade right behind a multisig and a timelock and checks storage layout in CI on every change.

003What are the custody options, and how do they affect architecture?

Assets can be held in user-controlled wallets, in smart accounts with recovery rules, in multisig wallets, in MPC wallets where no single party holds a full key, or with a qualified custodian that takes legal responsibility, each with different trade-offs between control, operational risk, and liability. Whether your product ever holds user assets is also the question that most often determines how regulators classify it. A well-built architecture decides the custody model first and designs key management, signing flows, and incident procedures around that decision.

004How do we choose between a layer-1 and a layer-2?

A layer-1 such as Ethereum offers the strongest settlement guarantees and the deepest liquidity at the highest fees, while layer-2 rollups inherit much of that security at lower cost, with differences in how withdrawals work: optimistic rollups impose a challenge window and ZK rollups rely on validity proofs. Each also differs in sequencer decentralization, bridging risk, tooling, and where the users and the liquidity you need already are. A well-reasoned choice starts from the users and the unit economics, launches on one chain, and keeps the code portable rather than going multi-chain on day one.

005How might regulators classify a token, and what does that mean for the product?

In the United States, a token may be treated as a security under the Howey test, as a commodity, or as something that triggers money transmission rules under FinCEN and the states, depending on how it is sold and used. In Canada, the securities regulators have published guidance on when crypto assets and crypto trading platforms fall under securities law, platforms generally must register or operate under undertakings, and dealing in virtual currency makes a business a money services business registered with FINTRAC. Classification depends on facts and changes with enforcement, so this is a question for counsel; a well-built system supports whatever controls they specify, such as KYC gating, geofencing, transfer restrictions, and record-keeping.

006How do DeFi protocols actually get exploited?

The recurring causes are reentrancy, price oracle manipulation often funded with flash loans, access control mistakes on privileged functions, compromised upgrade or admin keys, rounding and precision errors in math, bridge vulnerabilities, and governance attacks where voting power is borrowed. Most of these are known classes with known defenses, and the losses usually come from a rushed deployment or an unaudited change. A well-built protocol tests the invariants attackers would target, limits what any single key can do, and monitors critical events so a pause can happen before the drain completes.

007What is an indexer or subgraph, and why does the app need one?

A blockchain node answers questions about current state and individual transactions, but it cannot efficiently answer the questions an application asks, such as every position held by a user or the history of a pool. An indexer listens to events and blocks, writes them into a queryable database, and must handle chain reorganizations and lag honestly, with hosted subgraphs or custom indexers as the usual options. A well-built indexer reports its lag, reprocesses after a reorg, and never shows the user a state the chain has since reverted.

008How do oracles work, and what are the trust assumptions?

An oracle brings off-chain information such as asset prices on chain, either pushed by a network of node operators, pulled on demand with signed updates, or computed from on-chain sources such as a time-weighted average price on a decentralized exchange. Each has failure modes: stale updates, deviation thresholds that lag a crash, thin liquidity that makes an on-chain price manipulable, and operator collusion. A well-built protocol documents its oracle assumptions, checks staleness and deviation before acting on a price, and has a circuit breaker for when the feed looks wrong.

009What is account abstraction, and what does it change for users?

Account abstraction, standardized on the EVM through ERC-4337, lets a user's account be a smart contract rather than a key pair, so the account can define its own rules: who pays gas, which signatures count, session keys for a game or an app, spending limits, and social recovery. Bundlers and paymasters are the new infrastructure pieces that relay these operations and sponsor fees. A well-built product uses it to remove seed phrases and gas from the first-time experience while keeping the trust assumptions about the paymaster and the bundler explicit.

010What does a mainnet launch involve operationally?

A launch is a scripted sequence: deterministic deployment, contract verification on explorers, parameter checks against the specification, transfer of ownership to a multisig behind a timelock, activation of monitoring on critical events, and a public bug bounty, with a communications plan for the first days. The incident runbook should name who can pause what and how fast. A well-prepared team rehearses the whole sequence on a fork until the checklist runs without surprises.

011Which KYC, sanctions, and Travel Rule obligations apply to crypto businesses?

Businesses that exchange, transfer, or hold virtual currency for customers are generally money services businesses under Canadian and US anti-money-laundering law, with client identification, record-keeping, and reporting duties, and both countries apply versions of the FATF Travel Rule requiring originator and beneficiary information to accompany transfers above a threshold. Sanctions screening applies regardless of business model, and regulators have sanctioned specific addresses and protocols. The scope depends on your role in the transaction, so confirm it with counsel; a well-built platform integrates chain analytics for wallet screening and keeps the records a regulator will ask to see.

012What is MEV, and how does it affect protocol design?

Maximal extractable value is the profit that block builders and searchers capture by ordering, inserting, or censoring transactions, and users feel it as front-running, sandwich attacks on swaps, and liquidations taken at the worst moment. It is a structural feature of public mempools rather than a bug, and layer-2 sequencers change the dynamics without removing it. A well-designed protocol limits the damage with slippage controls, batch or commit-reveal mechanisms, and private order flow where appropriate, and tests its economics against adversarial ordering rather than the happy path.

Crypto & Web3

What would you improve first?

Costs, speed, revenue or hours of manual work. Tell us what matters most and we will show you how we would approach it.

  1. 001

    We read every request

    Someone who has worked in your sector, not a sales queue.

  2. 002

    We reply with a first view

    How we would approach it, and a time to talk.

  3. 003

    Scope under NDA

    We review what you run today and come back with scope, timeline and cost.

NDA available on request